Educational Scenario: This is a fictional case study created for educational purposes. Business details are not real, but the attack methods and impacts represent documented cybersecurity threats.

Legal Services
Critical Impact
Business Email Compromise
Educational Scenario

Law Firm Client Wire Transfer Fraud

Attackers impersonated a law firm to redirect a $2.3M real estate transaction, nearly causing the firm to lose their license.

Potential Impact
$2,300,000
Timeline
2 days
Business Size
8 attorneys, 15 staff members
Scenario Location
Austin, Texas
Attack Timeline Scenario
1

Initial Compromise

January 18, 2024

Criminals sent wire transfer instructions appearing to come from the law firm to clients closing on a $2.3M commercial property

2

Wire Transfer Sent

January 19, 2024

Client's bank processed the wire transfer to fraudulent account before anyone realized the instructions were fake

3

Discovery

January 19, 2024

Real estate agent called the firm asking about the wire transfer delay, leading to discovery of the fraud

4

Investigation Begins

January 20, 2024

FBI contacted, banks notified, emergency court proceedings initiated to try to recover funds

5

Partial Recovery

January 22, 2024

Only $800K of the $2.3M was recovered; remaining funds had been transferred overseas

Potential Impact Analysis

Financial Impact

$1.5M client loss, $300K in legal fees and investigation costs, malpractice insurance claims

Operational Impact

Deal cancellation, 2-week office shutdown for investigation, all clients required new security protocols

Reputation Impact

Loss of major clients, state bar investigation, negative legal industry publicity

Legal Impact

Malpractice lawsuits, state bar disciplinary proceedings, potential license suspension

Technical Attack Details

Attack Method

Email spoofing combined with social engineering targeting real estate transaction timing

Common Vulnerabilities

  • No email authentication (SPF/DMARC)
  • Predictable email signatures and formatting
  • No out-of-band verification for wire instructions
  • Client education gaps about verification procedures

Types of Data at Risk

  • Client transaction details
  • Wire transfer routing information
  • Property transaction timelines
  • Attorney-client communication patterns
Key Lessons
  • Attorney-client privilege doesn't protect against email spoofing
  • Real estate transactions are high-value targets
  • Out-of-band verification is critical for financial instructions
  • Malpractice insurance may not cover all cybersecurity incidents
Prevention Measures
  • Implement DMARC email authentication immediately
  • Require phone verification for all wire transfer instructions
  • Use encrypted client portals for sensitive communications
  • Regular cybersecurity training for all staff
  • Cyber liability insurance with specific BEC coverage
Educational Outcome

The firm narrowly avoided license suspension but had to pay substantial damages to the client. They've since implemented strict email security protocols and require all financial instructions to be verified by phone. Three partners left the firm due to the reputational damage.

Protect Your Business from These Threats

This scenario shows how these attacks can be prevented with proper email security measures. Get a free scan to see if your business is vulnerable.